Tag: newton

  • Finding the normal force in planar non-uniform circular motion using polar coordinates

    Finding the normal force in planar non-uniform circular motion using polar coordinates


    In this post, we will derive an expression for the normal force on a uniform mass which is in planar non-uniform circular motion using polar coordinates. Finding this expression is enormously useful to calculate under which circumstances a mass would be slung off its orbital path. Of course, there are numerous situations for which we should be able find the normal force. Here, we will look at a system as shown in Figure 1. Sometimes, obtaining an expression in terms of the variables given is not straightforward. You will find a useful trick in step 7 to arrive at an expression in terms of a simple $\theta$ instead of its secondary-order derivative $\ddot\theta$ which we initially obtain.

    This could be seen as an undergraduate-physics-level post. Download this article


    Notation

    We will apply Newton’s notation (the dot notation) whenever possible as this is the most compact form. For instance, if $\mathbf{x}$ is a vector, then its first-order and its second-order derivative with respect to time $t$ are denoted by

    \[ \dot{\mathbf{x}}\text{ and }\ddot{\mathbf{x}}, \]

    respectively. Where needed, in order to state explicitly that we are dealing with a time-derivative and to help in solving a time-integral for example, we will use Leibniz’s notation, i.e.

    \[ \frac{\text{d}\mathbf{x}}{\text{d}t}\text{ and }\frac{\text{d}^2\mathbf{x}}{\text{d}t^2}. \]

    Assignment

    Look at the system as sketched in Figure 1. Imagine we stand in front of this system. Mass $m$ is attached to a model string. At $t=0$, it rests at level with the centre of the cylinder with radius $R$ with the string draped over the top. A constant force $\mathbf{P}$ pulls the string downwards. At a later time $t$, mass $m$ has slid over the top with a coefficient of friction $\mu$. Let $\theta$ denote the angle between its initial and its current position, subtended at the centre of the cylinder. Calculate the normal force on $m$, and, hence, proof that the radius of the cylinder is irrelevant.

    Figure 1. The system

    Step 1. Force diagrams and unit vectors

    It is essential to draw force diagrams and unit vectors to define the acting forces and parameters. We choose the unit vectors to be the radial and the tangential vectors. This makes calculating most forces a lot easier. This is done in Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Force diagram and unit vectors at time $t>0$

    We identify the following forces on $m$:

    • $\mathbf{P}$ is the vector denoting the constant force pulling the model string,
    • $\mathbf{N}$ is the vector denoting the normal force acted on $m$ by the cylinder,
    • $\mathbf{F}$ is the vector denoting the frictional force,
    • $\mathbf{W}$ is the vector denoting the weight of $m$ as a result of the gravitational field of whatever planet the system is located,
    • $\mathbf{e}_r$ is the radial unit vector,
    • $\mathbf{e}_\theta$ is the tangential unit vector.

    Step 2. Apply Newton’s second law

    As this is a dynamical system, where $m$ is in non-uniform circular motion, we apply Newton’s second law, more specifically in the following form:

    \begin{equation}
    \sum\mathbf{F} = m\ddot{\mathbf{r}},
    \end{equation}

    where $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}$ is the rate of change of the rate of change over time, that is, the second time-derivative of the displacement vector $\mathbf{r}$ of mass $m$. We can now easily identify the constituents of the vector sum as we did that already in Step 1. And so, equation (1) becomes

    \begin{equation}
    m\ddot{\mathbf{r}} = \mathbf{P} + \mathbf{N} + \mathbf{F} + \mathbf{W}.
    \end{equation}

    Step 3. Rewrite the forces in terms of their magnitudes and unit vectors

    As pulling force $\mathbf{P}$ with magnitude $|\mathbf{P}|$ acts in the direction of tangential unit vector $\mathbf{e}_\theta$, we can write for $\mathbf{P}$:

    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{P} = |\mathbf{P}|\mathbf{e}_\theta.
    \end{equation}

    Since we don’t have any other information regarding this force, we leave it at that.

    Normal force $\mathbf{N}$ points in the direction of radial unit vector $\mathbf{e}_r$, so, we write:

    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{N} = |\mathbf{N}|\mathbf{e}_r.
    \end{equation}

    Friction $\mathbf{F}$ is in the opposite direction of the tangential unit vector $\mathbf{e}_\theta$, so, we need to place a minus-sign in its expression. Furthermore, as (dry) friction is usually modelled by the product of the coefficient of friction and the magnitude of the normal force, we can write:

    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{F} = \mu|\mathbf{N}|(-\mathbf{e}_\theta).
    \end{equation}

    Lastly, weight is the force due to gravity, $|\mathbf{W}|=mg$, where $g$ is the gravitational constant. However, we need to express this force in terms of its components. In this case, those components are directed parallel to the radial and tangential unit vectors. As the latter are pointed (partly) upwards, as opposed to the downwards-pointing weight, we already know that both its components carry a minus-sign, i.e. $(-\mathbf{e}_r)$ and $(-\mathbf{e}_\theta)$. What remains, is the correct expression for the magnitude of the weight in terms of its respective unit vectors.

    To clearly show how we get an expression for $\mathbf{W}$ in terms of its components along the directions of $\mathbf{e}_r$ and $\mathbf{e}_\theta$, have a look at Figure 3.

    Figure 3. Finding the components of $\mathbf{W}$

    What you see is just the weight vector $\mathbf{W}$ from our force diagram in Figure 2, including the radial and tangential unit vectors $\mathbf{e}_r$ and $\mathbf{e}_\theta$. For visual clarity, we subtended them on mass $m$. Also added are the two component vectors in the opposite direction of the unit vectors for which we need to find expressions.

    Let component vector $\mathbf{v}_r = a(-\mathbf{e}_r)$ and component vector $\mathbf{v}_\theta = b(-\mathbf{e}_\theta)$, where $a$ and $b$ are some magnitude value such that the vector sum of $\mathbf{v}_r$ and $\mathbf{v}_\theta$ equals $\mathbf{W}$. In other words,

    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{W} = \mathbf{v}_r + \mathbf{v}_\theta = a(-\mathbf{e}_r) + b(-\mathbf{e}_\theta).
    \end{equation}

    To find the values of the magnitude of $a$ and $b$, we use the fact that the magnitude $|\mathbf{W}| = mg$. So, using high school trigonometry, we deduce that

    \begin{align}
    a &= mg\sin\theta, \\
    b &= mg\cos\theta.
    \end{align}

    Now, we can write $\mathbf{W}$ in terms of its components by substituting equations (7) and (8) into (6):

    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{W} = mg\sin\theta(-\mathbf{e}_r) + mg\cos\theta(-\mathbf{e}_\theta).
    \end{equation}

    And so, if we substitute equations (3), (4), (5), and (9) into equation (2), we get:

    \begin{align}
    m\ddot{\mathbf{r}} &= |\mathbf{P}|\mathbf{e}_\theta + |\mathbf{N}|\mathbf{e}_r + \mu|\mathbf{N}|(-\mathbf{e}_\theta)\nonumber \\
    &\hspace{2em}+ mg\sin\theta(-\mathbf{e}_r) + mg\cos\theta(-\mathbf{e}_\theta).
    \end{align}

    Step 4. Express the Cartesian $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}$ in polar coordinates

    As we know that the expression for the second time derivative of non-uniform circular motion is

    \begin{equation}
    \ddot{\mathbf{r}} = -R\dot{\theta}^2\mathbf{e}_r + R\ddot{\theta}\mathbf{e}_\theta,
    \end{equation}

    where $R$ is the radius of the circular motion, i.e. the cylinder. We proceed to substitute this into equation (10).

    And so, we get

    \begin{align*}
    m(-R\dot{\theta}^2\mathbf{e}_r + R\ddot{\theta}\mathbf{e}_\theta) &= |\mathbf{P}|\mathbf{e}_\theta + |\mathbf{N}|\mathbf{e}_r + \mu|\mathbf{N}|(-\mathbf{e}_\theta) \\
    &\hspace{2em}+ mg\sin\theta(-\mathbf{e}_r) + mg\cos\theta(-\mathbf{e}_\theta),
    \end{align*}

    which, of course, after expansion, becomes

    \begin{align}
    -mR\dot{\theta}^2\mathbf{e}_r + mR\ddot{\theta}\mathbf{e}_\theta &= |\mathbf{P}|\mathbf{e}_\theta + |\mathbf{N}|\mathbf{e}_r + \mu|\mathbf{N}|(-\mathbf{e}_\theta) \nonumber \\
    &\hspace{2em}+ mg\sin\theta(-\mathbf{e}_r) + mg\cos\theta(-\mathbf{e}_\theta).
    \end{align}

    Step 5. Resolve radially and tangentially

    We can now resolve equation (12) into its radial and tangential components.

    \begin{align}
    \mathbf{e}_r &: -mR\dot{\theta}^2 = N – mg\sin\theta, \\
    \mathbf{e}_\theta &: mR\ddot{\theta} = P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta.
    \end{align}

    Step 6. Write down the equation of motion (in polar coordinates)

    Rearranging equation (14), we can write down the second-order differential equation of motion:

    \begin{equation}
    \ddot{\theta} = \frac{P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta}{mR}.
    \end{equation}

    While we could have solved equation (14) for $N$, this would still leave us with the second time-derivative of $\theta$. Instead, we want an expression of $N$ in terms of a simple $\theta$. This means that we need to get rid of $\ddot{\theta}$ in some way. It is not immediately clear how equation (14) or (15) should be operated on to achieve this. However, here is a neat trick.

    Step 7. The trick

    Have a look at the following equation where we apply the chain rule:

    \begin{equation}
    \frac{\text{d}\dot{\theta}^2}{\text{d}t} = \frac{\text{d}\dot{\theta}^2}{\text{d}\dot{\theta}}\frac{\text{d}\dot{\theta}}{\text{d}t} = 2\dot{\theta}\frac{\text{d}\dot{\theta}}{\text{d}t} = 2\dot{\theta}\ddot{\theta}.
    \end{equation}

    So, if we substitute equation (15) into (16), we get

    \begin{equation}
    \frac{\text{d}\dot{\theta}^2}{\text{d}t} = 2\dot{\theta}\left(\frac{P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta}{mR}\right).
    \end{equation}

    If we now integrate both sides with respect to time, we get

    \begin{align}
    \int \frac{\text{d}\dot{\theta}^2}{\text{d}t}\text{d}t &= \int 2\dot{\theta}\left(\frac{P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta}{mR}\right)\text{d}t, \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 + A &= 2 \int \frac{\text{d}\theta}{\text{d}t}\left(\frac{P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta}{mR}\right)\text{d}t, \nonumber \\
    &\text{where $A$ is an arbitrary constant}, \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 + A &= 2 \int \left(\frac{P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta}{mR}\right)\text{d}\theta, \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 + A &= \frac{2}{mR} \int (P – \mu N – mg\cos\theta)\,\text{d}\theta, \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 + A &= \frac{2}{mR} \left( P\int 1\,\text{d}\theta – \mu N\int 1\,\text{d}\theta – mg\int \cos\theta\,\text{d}\theta\right), \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 + A &= \frac{2P\theta}{mR} – \frac{2\mu N\theta}{mR} – \frac{2mg\sin\theta}{mR} + B, \nonumber \\
    &\text{where $B$ is an arbitrary constant}, \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 &= \frac{2P\theta}{mR} – \frac{2\mu N\theta}{mR} – \frac{2g\sin\theta}{R} + B – A, \nonumber \\
    \dot{\theta}^2 &= \frac{2P\theta}{mR} – \frac{2\mu N\theta}{mR} – \frac{2g\sin\theta}{R} + C, \\
    &\text{where $C=B-A$} \nonumber.
    \end{align}

    Solving the initial condition problem to find $C$, we use the fact that at $t=0$, angle $\theta = 0$, thus $\dot{\theta} = \ddot{\theta} = 0$. This renders $C = 0$ in equation (18), and so, we have

    \begin{equation}
    \dot{\theta}^2 = \frac{2P\theta}{mR} – \frac{2\mu N\theta}{mR} – \frac{2g\sin\theta}{R}.
    \end{equation}

    Note, we now have obtained an expression for $\dot{\theta}^2$ which already appeared in equation (13). We can, therefore, substitute equation (19) in (13), and we obtain:

    \begin{equation}
    -mR\left(\frac{2P\theta}{mR} – \frac{2\mu N\theta}{mR} – \frac{2g\sin\theta}{R}\right) = N – mg\sin\theta.
    \end{equation}

    Expanding and rearranging this, we get

    \begin{align}
    N – mg\sin\theta &= -2P\theta + 2\mu N\theta + 2mg\sin\theta, \nonumber \\
    N – 2\mu N\theta &= -2P\theta + 2mg\sin\theta + mg\sin\theta, \nonumber \\ N(1 – 2\mu \theta) &= -2P\theta + 3mg\sin\theta, \nonumber \\
    N &= \frac{3mg\sin\theta – 2P\theta}{1-2\mu\theta}.
    \end{align}

    So, now we have an expression of $N$ in terms of the gravitational constant $g$, the variables $m$, $\mu$, and $P$, and the more reasonable $\theta$ instead of $\dot\theta^2$.

    And so, if we want to calculate when a mass would be slung out of its orbital path, we write $N = 0$ as this means, in physical terms, that the mass isn’t resting on the cylinder anymore (since it doesn’t exert a normal force on the mass). In other words, find the roots of equation (21) to find the one unknown variable. Note, $R$ does not play a role. Of course, bear in mind that $m$ is a point mass.

  • Just a minute: what is a black hole?

    Just a minute: what is a black hole?


    Much like any question in the vain of ‘what is (…love…)’, for which mathematical, physical, molecular, biological, psychological, philosophical, literary, and artistic approaches could be employed, here too, are several ways to approximate the answer to the question ‘What is a black hole?’


    Let’s take the notion of escape velocity, which is the minimum speed (in a specific direction) needed for an object to break loose of the gravitational domination of a massive body. Larger gravity means that you have to fly faster to get off the planet.

    Instead of a planet, let’s pretend we have a rocket on the surface of the Sun. Why the Sun, you might ask. Rest assured, we’ll definitely get to that. In the sketch below you see the situation at hand.

    Turns out, the larger the Sun’s mass, the stronger its gravitational influence on the rocket on its surface. Sounds obvious enough, right? In the sketch, the Sun’s mass is symbolised by ‘big $M$’. Of course, the rocket has a mass too, so this is denoted by ‘small m’. Lastly, the distance between the centre of the Sun(’s mass) and that of the rocket plays a big role. The larger the distance, the weaker the gravitational influence. This distance is denoted by the letter $r$. This obviously also means, the smaller the distance, the stronger the gravitational influence.

    Assuming the mass of the rocket (‘small m’) stays constant, we say that the gravitational influence is proportional to $M$ and inversely proportional to $r$. We can now begin to describe a mathematical relationship between the gravitational influence, $M$, and $r$. We can write:

    \begin{equation*} \text{gravitational influence} \propto \frac{M}{r}. \end{equation*}

    This weird $\propto$-sign means ‘is proportional to’. The fraction $\frac{M}{r}$ means that, if $M$ grows bigger, the division grows bigger. If $r$ grows bigger, the division shrinks smaller. Let’s just fill in some numbers to see how this works. Suppose, $M = 600$ and $r = 5$.

    \begin{equation*} \text{gravitational influence} \propto \frac{600}{5} = 120. \end{equation*}

    Let’s make $M$ six times bigger: $M = 3600$. We get

    \begin{equation*} \text{gravitational influence} \propto \frac{3600}{5} = 720. \end{equation*}

    Not surprisingly, the division becomes six times larger too. If we make $r$ smaller, say $r=2$, the result becomes even larger:

    \begin{equation*} \text{gravitational influence} \propto \frac{3600}{2} = 1800. \end{equation*}

    So, what would happen if—in a thought experiment—we would add more mass $M$ to our Sun? Indeed, the gravitational influence on the rocket would become larger. In turn, the rocket would have to fly faster in order to leave the Sun.

    What would happen if—in a further thought experiment—we would not just add more mass $M$ to our Sun but also shrink its radius $r$, so that it becomes a small, very dense ball of stuff? Indeed, the gravitational influence would become even larger, so, the rocket would have to fly even faster.

    Schwarzschild

    The real formula that Newton came up with for the gravitational influence, which we call Newton’s law of universal gravitation, is a little different from what we have used up until now, and goes as follows:

    Of course, Einstein came up with an even more accurate set of formulas, but for our purpose, we won’t be using them as Newton’s law works just as well, in this case.

    John Michell, an 18th-century, English philosopher and clergyman, basically wondered if the ratio between mass $M$ and distance $r$ could lead to a gravitational influence so big that the required speed for a rocket to fly off to the stars would exceed the speed of light. He wasn’t sure if anything with that much mass and such short a radius could ever exist, but if so, then, in theory, ‘dark stars’ could exist.

    When some stars reach the end of their lives, they become supernovae. They explode their outer shells into space, while the inner shells of matter move inwards. This means that the surface quickly shrinks towards the centre of mass. This means that things, such as rockets, can get closer to the centre of mass while experiencing the gravitational influence of all that mass underneath it.

    Given the amount of the star’s imploding mass $M$, at some point, there will be a distance $r$ around it where the gravitational influence is so large, that the minimum speed for a rocket to escape it will have to be larger than the speed of light.

    Karl Schwarzschild

    It was Karl Schwarzschild, a German physicist who found this distance using Albert Einstein’s equations of general relativity (the more accurate set of formulas compared to Newton’s).

    Given a certain mass, the Schwarzschild radius is the distance from the centre of mass below which the magnitude of the escape velocity is larger than the speed of light. And so, this part of the universe will be black, whence no one returns. Every point around the centre of this mass as described by the Schwarzschild radius, forms what we call the event horizon.

    A black hole is thus a region in the universe where the gravitational influence is so large that nothing, not even light, can escape it. Or, to put it a bit more technically, it is a region of spacetime where every possible future leads to its singularity. We might explain the latter in another article, in the future.

    Event Horizon Telescope

    A vast array of radio observatories and telescope facilities around the world basically turned our entire planet into one big telescope, called the Event Horizon Telescope.

    On Wednesday, 10 April 2019, at 15:00 CET, the first photo of a supermassive black hole in the middle of a galaxy called Messier 87 was presented. Later, a photo of the black hole in our own Milky Way, called Sagittarius A*, will be expected.

    The observations may test Einstein’s general relativity yet again. Perhaps more on that in another article.

    We highly recommend watching the recording of the live stream of the presentation of the results.

    We have been focussing on non-rotating black holes. The physical models for a rotating black holes differ to some degree, but not significantly for the scope of this article.

    Featured image: the image of the supermassive black hole Messier 87. Credit: EHT Collaboration